Flock Servance Cameras: Public Safety — or the Birth of a Permanent Surveillance State?

September 11, 2026
Glenn Newman

---

Flock cameras and automated license‑plate readers can help police. They can find stolen cars, track down hit‑and‑run suspects, locate missing people, and give investigators a lead when everything else has failed.

Yes — that’s real. That matters.

But let’s stop pretending that’s the whole story.

Because when a community builds a system that quietly records where everyone goes, every hour of every day, we are not just fighting crime. We are building something far more powerful — and far more dangerous — than most people realize.

These cameras don’t just watch criminals. They watch everyone.

They can create a searchable, permanent record of ordinary people living ordinary lives:
Who went to church.
Who visited a doctor.
Who stopped at a gun shop.
Who attended a protest.
Who met with an attorney.
Who simply drove across town with their family.

None of these things are crimes. But a system that records license plates can document all of them — automatically, silently, relentlessly.

We’re told, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.”

History laughs at that.

During the COVID‑19 lockdowns, the definition of “unacceptable behavior” changed overnight. On Easter Sunday 2020, Kentucky State Police recorded license plates at Maryville Baptist Church and slapped 14‑day quarantine notices on worshippers’ cars. When some parishioners covered their plates, troopers reportedly wrote down VIN numbers instead.

Think about that.

Liquor stores stayed open. Big‑box stores stayed open. But people attending church were treated like a public‑health threat.

Now imagine that same community had been covered in Flock cameras.

Do you honestly believe those cameras would have been used only for stolen vehicles and violent crimes?

Or would they have given authorities a frictionless, effortless way to identify:

Every car entering a church parking lot. Every business owner refusing to close. Every pastor refusing to lock the doors. Every family simply driving somewhere they weren’t “supposed” to go.

This is the debate we must have before these systems are built — not after the infrastructure is already in place.

The technology isn’t the enemy. Police need tools. Victims deserve justice. Communities deserve safety.

But free people deserve limits on government power.

If communities choose to adopt automated license‑plate readers, they must demand strict safeguards: transparency, short retention periods, independent oversight, limited access, real audit trails, and warrants where appropriate. And these systems must never become tools for monitoring lawful religious, political, medical, or personal activity.

Because technology cannot tell the difference between a criminal and a citizen exercising a constitutional right.

It sees a plate. It records a location. It creates data.

And that leads to a question almost no one asks:

Where does all that data go?

The answer is simple: Data Centers.

Every scan becomes another entry. Multiply that by thousands of cameras, millions of vehicles, and years of storage, and we are building a massive, permanent digital record of Americans’ movements.

The real question isn’t whether today’s officials can be trusted. It’s whether we should build a system that tomorrow’s officials — people we cannot predict — will inherit.

Today, the target may be criminals. Tomorrow, the definition of “suspicious” could change. Policies could change. Leadership could change.

But the database will still be there. Once a surveillance infrastructure exists, expanding it is far easier than dismantling it.

So the question isn’t whether Flock cameras can catch criminals. Of course they can.

The question is whether public safety requires building a permanent tracking system for nearly everyone.

And the most important question is this:

If your community had Flock cameras in 2020, do you truly believe they would have been used only for criminal investigations — or would they have been used to enforce lockdown orders?

Before we give government the ability to track everyone, we must decide exactly where the line is — and make sure that line cannot be moved whenever those in power decide it’s convenient.

Because freedom is not protected by trusting government with unlimited power, Freedom is protected by making sure government never has unlimited power in the first place.

Tom Roten Interview: Flock Cameras Help Cops Nab The Wrong Person